• photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Holy fuck. When was this? The last time something like this happened at Starbase was before the integrated flight tests started. With this, plus the recent suborbital Starship failures, it’s really not looking great for the program.

  • DiggyDiggyMole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    The headline in the news banner just had impeccable comedic timing: “First next-gen superheavy possibly under construction” a few seconds after the rocket exploded

  • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    That’s a glorious boom

    But that’s why they do testing, it’s cheaper to boom on testbed than on a launch pad or in the air

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      But the idea behind doing things with the risk of them going boom is to learn things. I’m not sure they’re learning what they need if they’re going from testing Starship in launches to going back to static firing. If the idea is to rework the engines for Starship, I have to wonder if that’s a fundamental enough step to put the entire project back to pretty much square one.

        • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Agreed. “Spin” would be the better word.

          It’s another embarrassment added to a long list of embarrassments at this point. SpaceX has utterly failed to deliver on its contracts and at some point people need to recognize that the private sector does not always do it better. Especially when the company is run by a conman.

          • dwindling7373@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Covering up the truth by means of displaying fake information, like saying it doesn’t apply here because there was no data involved and the source was not a political entity.

            • chloroken@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              Thanks for the vocabulary suggestion and modified definition, but my usage of the term was just fine.