!lemmysilver

The output of the above command is nearly the same for me.

Even though I have manually added myself to /etc/sudoers file, my groups output is very weird. It’s just xavier666 root

Kind of stumped here.

user-IDs (prefixed with ‘#’)

And I thought it just meant a comment.

Thanks for this, I had no idea.

For i3, the desktop file is like this (present in /usr/share/xsessions)

[Desktop Entry]
Name=i3
Comment=improved dynamic tiling window manager
Exec=i3
TryExec=i3
Type=Application
X-LightDM-DesktopName=i3
DesktopNames=i3
Keywords=tiling;wm;windowmanager;window;manager;

And sway (present in /usr/share/wayland-sessions)

[Desktop Entry]
Version=1.0
Name=Sway
Comment=An i3-compatible Wayland compositor
Exec=/usr/bin/sway
Type=Application
DesktopNames=sway

Gdm probably sums up all the DE from both the wayland and x11 sessions.

There are some files & directories in /etc/gdm3 but I’m too lazy to go through all of them

Init       PostSession  Prime     config-error-dialog.sh  greeter.dconf-defaults
PostLogin  PreSession   PrimeOff  custom.conf             Xsession

Thanks for your help.

Check how your environment variables differ between i3 and sway and see if that might be the issue

Just running set for each session and running diff should be enough, right?

Just the way I launch sway; via gdm.

As what user are you executing all these ‘groups’ commands?

I’m using my default user (xavier666)

The “normal” user should not be in the root group, and root should not be in the normal user’s group.

I just made the user a root user/system administrator during the Ubuntu installation process, which is very standard.

Have you done other things beside the “fix” you mentioned?

AFAIK, I haven’t done any changes. This is a single user system. I checked the contents of /etc/sudoers and these are the only other lines of significance. I didn’t change them (Why are there % signs?)

# User privilege specification
root    ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL
xavier666    ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL

# Members of the admin group may gain root privileges
%admin ALL=(ALL) ALL

# Allow members of group sudo to execute any command
%sudo   ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL

That “fix” from your op, btw, looks totally valid to me.

It’s working fine also. However, I believe in “don’t touch what ain’t broke” and “why isn’t it documented?”

However, in my installations I have never touched the sudoer file to make the ONLY user part of sudo group post install. Either I’m dumb or I’m launching sway/wayland with improper permissions.

I also can’t find anything on the arch wiki which deals with this.

Why isn’t the same problem happening on i3?

Yeah, I ran it and rebooted it. But no change :(

I’ll do it once more just in case.

I’m unsure how to use the command. I added it to the main Sway config file, which means it’s executed whenever Sway starts (Post login).

However, it didn’t make any difference. I also ran it manually

$ loginctl enable-linger xavier666
$ sudo visudo
[sudo] password for xavier666:
Sorry, user xavier666 is not allowed to execute '/usr/sbin/visudo' as root on <HOSTNAME>.

My lazy hack

If it looks stupid but works, then it’s not stupid

these are all text files

Yeah, it just calls the executable mentioned in the .desktop file (/usr/bin/sway). It should not be a GDM, issue, right?

I also checked that I don’t have seatd installed, which is a “minimal user, seat and session management daemon” mentioned in arch wiki (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Sway). Could it be related?

Sorry, I have to go now. More tonight, if you want.

No hurry, the fix I am using is not causing issue. I just want to know why this is happening. This is a fun research problem.

PS: I checked Google and I didn’t find anyone who has faced the same issue.

Inisde i3 WITHOUT FIX

$ groups

xavier666 adm cdrom sudo dip plugdev lpadmin lxd sambashare

$ groups xavier666

xavier666 : xavier666 adm cdrom sudo dip plugdev lpadmin lxd sambashare

Inside sway WITH/WITHOUT FIX

$ groups

xavier666 root

$ groups xavier666

xavier666 : xavier666 adm cdrom sudo dip plugdev lpadmin lxd sambashare

PS: I corrected the username, it should be xavier666. I corrected the main post.

but with the way the sway session is started, as opposed to the i3 session. We need more info on this.

I’m using gdm to start sway. I’m using the laptop’s built-in fingerprint scanner to unlock (Not sure if it matters). I saved the fingerprint in the Gnome session long back.

gdm probably looks inside /usr/share/wayland-sessions and finds sway.desktop and uses it to launch Sway.

I’ve tried to keep things as vanilla as possible.

Isn’t i3 Xorg only, and sway wayland only?

Correct.

Maybe wayland is launched using restrictive set of permissions.

OP doesn’t need to hear this. OP’s a highly trained professional.

I once installed Bazzite on my PC. I am an sway user/addict. So thought about installing sway on Bazzite.

Below is my journey

Let me try to download and compile it.

Downloaded but it won’t compile.

The libraries/dependancies are not installed. Here, try installing the packages via brew.

Nope, some of them are available and some are not on Brew.

Now what do I do? Okay, there is something called distrobox where I can install whatever I want.

Looks like I have to learn distrobox. Wait, sway is not a simple application, it’s a full blown window manager. Even if it compiles, will it work?

Most of the people online (Discord) told me the process won’t be very pretty.

Do I want to invest another week experimenting with distrobox?

Nope, installed Nobara the next day and I’m happy.

Disclaimer: Bazzite is a fantastic distro and it’s powering my RoG Ally. Atomic distros are fantastic for the niche they fill.

Obligatory https://lemmy.world/c/fuckcars

Development, I’m not sure about

This has been done by Github several times. But thankfully, all major distros are not primarily hosted by Github.

However, I am unsure how powerful sanctions are on distros if the US becomes relentless.

I had a brain fart. I completely forgot that Canonical is British.

That’s gonna be a no from me, dawg

tl;dr for others

A: “I have an Pink Unicorn inside the trunk of my car. It vanishes the moment you try to open the trunk or look at it.”

B: “What? That’s absurd”

A: “I know it exists. It’s up to you to disprove it”

B: “But there is no way one can capture/observe/understand it with any sort of scientific instrument”

A: “Don’t care. Skill issue”