Man, I guess there’s no point in even trying to improve the system if there’s going to be opposition.
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
I will advocate to replace it when I’m in office and a Democrat, against the protests of some of my co-workers. As the other commenter pointed out, Newsom killed an anti-FPTP bill, but that means there’s enough support in the California legislature to get a bill to his desk.
I hold no illusions that fixing one aspect of this flawed existence will fix all the other aspects of this flawed existence.
I mean, I want to replace FPTP though. Any kind of proportional system is ideal, but Sequential Proportional Approval Voting is ideal.
Liz@midwest.socialto World News@lemmy.ml•Chinese students in US tell of ‘chilling’ interrogations and deportationsEnglish1·1 year agoYeah I mean, pay your graduate students about twice as much and make them only work 40 hours a week. Then you won’t have to import labor from outside the county.
Liz@midwest.socialto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's a scam that's so normalized that we don't even realize it's a scam anymore?English1·2 years agoApproval Voting and multi-winner districts let’s gooooooo!
The way statistics work, 1000 people is more than adequate for a population the size of Israel. It’s honestly overkill, if anything. The real question is “are the respondents a representative sample?” That is, is the way you chose who to question and how to question them introducing any systemic bias in your results? For this survey, if everyone lived in the West Bank, that would be a clear source of bias in the data. But if people are randomly selected by, say, phone number, then you would have to worry about more subtle biases before agreeing that the data is sound.