

11·
4 days agoI thought SCOTUS stopped nationwide injunctions. This sounds like a ruling.
I thought SCOTUS stopped nationwide injunctions. This sounds like a ruling.
Ahh, they are hard to find on mobile in vertical. The filtering section is scrollable, but it’s not obvious that that frame can scroll independently of the entire page, so didn’t see them the first time.
Needs filters for HDR, ports, refresh (rate and variability compatability), and size.
“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, …”
And
“… nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Let’s see how SCOTUS tries to get around these
I should have been more clear, they can no longer implement temporary injunctions. These were used by judges to stop further action while the case was proceeding in their court.
Once the trial has been conducted and the judge makes a decision, they can decide that a nationwide law is not valid and therefore stop it’s application everywhere.